Theology of Liberation

When talking about Liberation Theology will be a lot of pros cons place in society and in ourselves. As in the history of liberation theology from Latin America began in the mid-century ago, which many in the stretcher by the theologians are willing to distinguish between methods with the traditional theology of liberation theology. Traditional theology is a theology which deals with God alone, while the theology of liberation is a way of doing theology that comes from the reflection of faith in the midst of the concrete historical reality. Namely theology memprihatini fate and solidarity to those who suffer injustice, lost, poor, oppressed and victimized history; theology that would transform the world.On his way there are some Muslim figures who eventually also make a reduction or re-interpretation of his religion. Whether it be the history of religion, texts, laws and so forth. Okoh one of the most famous is Hasan Ali Shariati and agamnya Hanafi.Dalam understanding that not only discusses the problem of deity alone, or fiqi'ah laws concerning the procedures for worship, but religion is also supposed to discuss social issues and politics that in natural communities directly.Especially about poverty, injustice, greed and oppression done by the class (bourgeoisie) above against weak people (poor or proletarian). Theology although derived from the Scriptural text that revealed by God, most of the situational, contextual, and normative metaphysics. Militant spirit that stood out when it identifies itself with the oppressed"Why did you not fight in the way of Allah and defend the oppressed, men, women and children who said," Our Lord! Remove us from this town whose inhabitants do evil. Give us the protection and help from you (Sura 4:75)Liberation theology is a spiritual product. What to include in it a religious doctrine that really makes sense, Liberation Theology has contributed very greatly to the expansion and strengthening of these movements. The doctrine makes sense it has formed a radical shift from traditional teaching keagaman established. Some of the doctrine are: 1). The lawsuit moral and social dependence on very hard against capitalism as a system of unjust and oppressive, 2) use of analytical tools of Marxism in order to understand the causes of poverty, 3) a special option for the poor and solidarity to the struggle for their demands of freedom, 4 ) A new pembacan of religious texts, 5) Resistance against idolatry as the main enemy of religion 6) Criticism of traditional theology teradap double-faced as a result of Greek Platonic philosophy.In view of Ali Shariati that:Is not enough to suggest we should return to Islam. We must specify which one we mean Islam: Islam or Islamic Marwan Abu Zarr (bin. Affan), the ruler. Both are called Islamic, even though there are big differences between them. Of them is the Caliph of Islam's, and the ruler's palace. While the other is the Muslim people, they are exploited and poor. Furthermore, not enough valid by simply saying, that people should have a concern (concern) to the poor and oppressed. Corrupt caliph who said so. Islam is really more than just concern. True Islam ordered the faithful to fight for justice, equality and poverty eradication ".Because the power of religion was quite able to resist the tyranny of capitalism is now happening. But until now it remains a necessity, because there are many religious figures who are even more fun berasyik-ria discuss about death. But the religious leaders discuss just forget about life today. And it is so in love by the holders of tyranny, the bourgeois (capital). Because it can perpetuate their kekusaan without the nagging. Are we going to let him?